EU AI Act Compliance: Risk Classification & Conformity | micara
micara
Compliance & Security · EU AI Act

EU AI Act Compliance: From Engineers Who Build AI Systems

Whether you provide or deploy AI systems: the AI Act demands risk classification, technical documentation, data governance and human oversight. We've built AI from microcontroller to training cluster, so we translate the regulation into engineering reality, not legal abstractions.

Request an AI Act exposure check

What we deliver

01 · Classify

Inventory of your AI systems and use cases, risk classification (prohibited / high-risk / limited / minimal), and your role per system: provider, deployer, importer or distributor.

02 · Comply

Technical documentation, data-governance and quality-management processes, conformity assessment preparation, transparency obligations, written by people who understand model training and deployment.

03 · Govern

Ongoing AI governance: monitoring, logging, human oversight, incident handling, integrated with your ISMS and NIS2 processes rather than bolted on beside them.

Embedded AI has AI Act exposure too

AI on devices (in machines, vehicles, infrastructure) often lands in high-risk categories and additionally triggers Cyber Resilience Act obligations. We assess both in one pass, because we build exactly these systems in our engineering practice.

Embedded AI & Engineering NIS2 implementation

Using or shipping AI? Know your obligations.

Request an exposure check